The different management styles in the world

Amélie Nothomb's novel Stupeurs et tremblements is a great example of how management styles can differ from Europe to Asia! Indeed, the way employees deal with emotions, conflict, time, hierarchy, and communication is always very different from one country to another. We do not run a company in the same way in France, Japan, Germany, the United States or Norway.

Multicultural teams are a great asset for companies, but it can also be a real challenge for managers, who have to manage habits, behaviours and reactions specific to each country. What seems natural in France or in Europe is not necessarily so in other countries, and vice versa. It’s important to identify these differences in order to understand them and work better together.

So what are the major differences between management styles around the world? How to navigate between these cultural differences?

🛫 Four examples of management styles in the world

To see this more clearly, let's take a look at the management style of four countries: the United States, France, Sweden and Japan.

🇺🇸 Management in the United States

In the United States, you set a goal and you stick to it! Managers in the US are results-oriented. Driven by performance, they go straight to the point. "To motivate an American team, you have to talk about the goal, then explain to team members which individual objectives they have to achieve," explains Erin Meyer, professor of intercultural management at INSEAD and author of The Culture Map: Breaking Through the Invisible Boundaries of Global Business. This direct and straight-forward attitude may seem a little aggressive at first, but that doesn't prevent American managers from:

• being open to change and innovation. It is a rather visionary management style.
• to put the forms. "Unlike the French, who use intensifiers when they disagree (such as "totally", "not at all", "completely"), Americans express themselves mostly with softeners ("possibly", "maybe"). In the same way, US managers insist on positive feedback to encourage their teams, while French managers tend to focus on what is wrong. Indeed, in the US, people are more likely to say "fantastic" or "amazing" in order to build trust with their employees. Erin Meyer believes that these cultural differences come from education, where American teachers are very encouraging ("You're almost there!"), unlike the French ("Not satisfactory").
  

🇫🇷 Management in France

While American managers like to go straight to the point, the French conceptualize their thinking and their message before making a decision. Very often, it's theory before practice.

"Intellectualism is something that is appreciated in France rather than mocked, although French management is attributed with the saying: "in practice it's a good idea, but will it work in theory?". "
In France, you have to prove something first and then apply it.

Management in France is rather directive, but there is still a possibility of debate between employees and managers. In the country of Descartes, unlike in England, Sweden or Japan, French people like to exchange opinions. Moreover, discussions often continue at lunchtime, when employees share lunch, unlike in Anglo-Saxon countries, where employees take a short break in front of their computers. This openness to debate does not prevent a rather traditional, autocratic and paternalistic management style, even if this is changing. In French companies, criticism can still be a bit harsh and demotivating. The British, for example, are known to be much more diplomatic. Most French managers seek compromise despite the weight of tradition that is still very present.

🇸🇪 Management in Sweden

The Nordic countries are the best in terms of benevolence as well as democratic and decentralized management. In Sweden, the hierarchy is very subtle, light and known as "primus inter pares". There is a great transparency regarding job positions and more equality between the employees. In Norway, it is a "friendly hierarchy". The boss remains accessible and the managers share the same offices as their employees. The well-being of the employees is the main focus.

🇯🇵 Management in Japan

In Japan, the notion of loyalty is very important at work. Salaries are composed of an average of 60% bonuses. Success is always collective rather than individual, hence the importance for Japanese managers to encourage consensus over conflict. It’s a management style that puts the responsibility of the employee at the center. Employees are constantly striving to improve. Managers pay attention to their team members, in order to anticipate any crisis or misunderstanding. Emotional intelligence is therefore a key skill, very important to the Japanese. Kaizen is apparently one of the most recognized management techniques in Japan. Invented by Toyota, it is based on the 5S method:

1. Seiri: sort
2. Seiton: set in order
3. Seiso: shine
4. Seiketsu: standardize
5. Shitsuke: sustain

🌐 How to manage a multicultural team?

Managing a multicultural team cannot be improvised. Here are 5 tips for managing an international team:

1. Use emotional intelligence to spot weak signals
2. Listen to cultural differences and try to understand them. For example, in Asia, communication is more indirect and implicit than in Europe, where management is more direct and explicit.
3. Personalize your management approach and be aware of the specificities of each country to avoid making mistakes. Do not behave in the same way with all the members of your team for the sake of fairness. Make sure to adopt a case-by-case management approach whenever possible.
4. Try to achieve a mutual understanding between you and your team members.
5. Organize team building to foster collaboration and relationships between each team member.

Finally, use the cultural difference as an opportunity rather than a risk that you want to control. In the end, it’s all about getting the best from each culture. Diversity is a strength, the results of multicultural teams can be very surprising and innovative!